United States v. Kips Bay Towers Condominium, Inc.

New York, New York · federal · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

HOA loss · pets-animals

What happened

After HUD investigation and charge, the United States sued Kips Bay Towers Condominium, Inc. on January 18, 2017, alleging the New York City condominium board refused to allow three residents with psychiatric disabilities to live with emotional support dogs. On February 28, 2018, a stipulation of settlement required $125,000 in damages and civil penalties and adoption of a new reasonable-accommodation policy, resolving the claims.

What the court (or agency) held

Condominium lost via public settlement. Kips Bay agreed to pay $125,000 total (damages and civil penalties) and to adopt a new RA policy covering assistance-animal accommodations—no trial verdict required.

Why this matters for members

Hard-line condo ESA refusals for psychiatric disabilities are classic FHA election cases. Settlements commonly pair six-figure money with a rewritten reasonable-accommodation policy and notice to residents.

What the member did

Residents' HUD complaints led to a charge and DOJ litigation resolved by public settlement.

Questions for the board

Questions for a lawyer

Citation

United States v. Kips Bay Towers Condominium, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00361 (S.D.N.Y.); stipulation of settlement entered Feb. 28, 2018 (2018-02-28). United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Outcome chip: FHA consent/settlement. Source: https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/united-states-v-kips-bay-towers-condominium-inc-sdny

_General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law._

Source opinion

General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. Confirm this against your documents and your state’s law.