Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners' Association v. Khan

Parsippany · NJ · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Member win · speech-flags

What happened

Wasim Khan posted two signs supporting his own Town Council candidacy—in a window and inside his door. Mazdabrook ordered them removed under near-total residential sign bans (except For Sale signs / unguided board consent). The association later sued to collect assessments and fines; Khan counterclaimed on free-speech grounds. The Appellate Division sided with Khan; on June 13, 2012, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed.

What the court (or agency) held

The New Jersey Supreme Court held that an HOA near-total ban on residential signs—except 'For Sale' signs, and otherwise only with unguided board consent—violated the State Constitution's free-speech guarantee. Political speech supporting one's own candidacy is core protected expression. Balancing the minimal interference with Mazdabrook's aesthetic/property interest against Khan's right to post political signs in his own window and door, the Court affirmed the Appellate Division. Associations may use reasonable time, place, and manner limits, but not a near-complete ban without standards.

Why this matters for members

New Jersey constitutional free-speech protections can reach private common-interest communities when they suppress political speech on a resident's own unit. Unguided consent regimes and near-total bans fare poorly against core political expression.

What the member did

Posted the candidate signs on his own unit, then raised the New Jersey Constitution as a defense/counterclaim when the association sued to collect fines and assessments.

Questions for the board

Questions for a lawyer

Citation

Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners' Association v. Khan, 210 N.J. 482, 43 A.3d 325 (2012); A-65-10 (067094) (2012-06-13). Supreme Court of New Jersey. Outcome chip: member_win. Source: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/2012/a-65-10.html

_General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law._

Source opinion

General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. Confirm this against your documents and your state’s law.