Grand Oaks Homeowners' Association v. Leonpacher

FL · Florida First District Court of Appeal

Member win · other

What happened

Norm and Carolyn Leonpacher obtained summary judgment against Grand Oaks Homeowners' Association. They then moved for attorney's fees under § 720.305(1) and the declaration's fee clause. The trial court found them prevailing parties but denied fees. On consolidated appeal, the First DCA affirmed other issues without discussion and reversed the fee denial, holding prevailing parties are entitled to reasonable fees (Mar. 3, 2009).

What the court (or agency) held

Homeowners who obtain summary judgment against their HOA are prevailing parties entitled to reasonable attorney fees under § 720.305(1) and the declaration's fee clause. The trial court correctly labeled them prevailing parties but erred in denying fees; fee denial was reversed.

Why this matters for members

A prevailing-party finding under HOA fee statutes/declaration clauses generally requires a fee award—courts may not acknowledge prevailing status and then refuse fees without a lawful basis.

What the member did

Obtained summary judgment against the association and moved for mandatory prevailing-party fees under statute and covenants.

Questions for the board

Questions for a lawyer

Citation

Grand Oaks Homeowners' Association v. Leonpacher, 8 So. 3d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (2009-03-03). Florida First District Court of Appeal. Outcome chip: fees/records hub / secondary. Source: https://hallapproved.com/fl/cases/appeals/2009/5055544/

_General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law._

Source opinion

General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. Confirm this against your documents and your state’s law.