Belmont Association, Inc. v. Farwig

Wake · NC · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Member win · architectural

What happened

Homeowners (Farwig) installed rooftop solar panels in Belmont (Wake County). The Architectural Review Committee denied approval for street-visible panels and the association imposed fines. The homeowners sought declaratory relief under N.C.G.S. § 22B-20; the trial court and a divided Court of Appeals sided with Belmont under the visibility exception in § 22B-20(d). On appeal of right based on the dissent, the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed and directed summary judgment for the homeowners on their declaratory-judgment claim.

What the court (or agency) held

The North Carolina Supreme Court held that Belmont's architectural-review denial of street-facing rooftop solar panels violated N.C.G.S. § 22B-20. Where the declaration did not expressly prohibit solar collectors but aesthetic ARC authority had the effect of prohibiting them, the restriction was void under § 22B-20(b). The Court held the § 22B-20(d) visibility exception did not apply absent an express solar restriction, reversed the Court of Appeals, and directed summary judgment for the homeowners on their declaratory-judgment claim.

Why this matters for members

North Carolina's solar statute voids covenants and ARC practices that effectively ban solar collectors unless an express solar restriction fits a statutory exception. Aesthetic ARC discretion alone is not enough to prohibit street-facing panels.

What the member did

Sought ARC approval and a resident petition, paid fines under protest to avoid lien escalation, counterclaimed for declaratory relief under the solar-collector statute, and pursued appeal to the Supreme Court.

Questions for the board

Questions for a lawyer

Citation

Belmont Association, Inc. v. Farwig, 381 N.C. 306, 2022-NCSC-64 (2022); No. 214A21 (2022-06-17). Supreme Court of North Carolina. Outcome chip: member_win. Source: https://law.justia.com/cases/north-carolina/supreme-court/2022/214a21.html

_General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law._

Source opinion

General information, not legal advice. Outcomes turn on facts and current law.

Not a law firm. Not legal advice. Confirm this against your documents and your state’s law.